Could David Roe please explain why having a second referendum is undemocratic?

Anyone who still wishes to leave the EU can vote No again.

Now that we know what kind of deal we are likely to get, some people may wish to change their mind.

What is wrong with that?

Why is what people wanted two years ago before the facts were known more important than what they want now?

If Mr Roe refuses to vote in a second referendum because he thinks it is a charade, then it is him that is creating a sham democracy.

Chris Jager

Malmesbury