Report this comment
  • "The Cirencester Parking Partnership.....will evidently require a scrutiny committee in order that the structure can be examined as it should be regulated by the Parking Amenities Authority , which should report directly to the over arching Countryside and Rural Authority for Parking......or C.R.A.P. as it will be known as....

    "Its your Council Tax that we spending"......."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

I take issue with your car parking comments

AS A member of the newly formed Cirencester Parking partnership, I take issue with the comments made by Gerald Wilkinson in his letter to the Standard which was published on May 3 - Town needs better parking.

Mr Wilkinson calls for lateral thinking to focus on car parking needs in Cirencester. He is obviously not aware that the recently created Cirencester Parking Partnership - bringing together representatives of the District Council, Town Council, Chamber of Commerce and the County - was designed to meet that need.

It's early days yet but we are making good progress on examining the strategic requirements across the town and considering issues such as attracting tourists while ensuring we can accommodate the needs of local residents and businesses. Bringing together parties with different perspectives is a refreshing and positive move and I trust that Mr Wilkinson will welcome this development.

More specifically, Mr Wilkinson referred to the delay in installing solar-powered pay and display machines at Cotswold District Council's Brewery Car Park, and queried what was happening. Well, if he cares to look again, he will see that there are six machines now up and running in the car park.

There was a slight delay in their introduction but this was due to financial processing problems which had nothing to do with the District Council, albeit we pushed hard to make sure those issues were resolved as soon as possible. Mr Wilkinson will also be pleased to note that customers using the new machines have to press a green button for a ticket.

He also suggested installing solar-powered machines at the District Council car park and making it available to everyone on weekends with cheap tariffs. He is obviously not aware of the costs involved in setting this up and the likelihood that it will be under-used, especially since there are normally ample spaces in car parks nearer the centre and all of them, with the exception of the Brewery, are free to users from 6pm on Saturdays through until 8am on Mondays.

He also queried why ‘CDC staff park for free’, however I can confirm that, with the exception of the Civil Enforcement Officers undertaking parking enforcement in these car parks, CDC staff, including myself, pay for public parking alongside all other customers.

Mr Wilkinson has also incorrectly stated that "you cannot tow away from an off street car park". As these car parks are on council-owned land, and the power to tow vehicles is detailed within the Parking Order for off-street car parks, the council can tow cars should the circumstances warrant this enforcement measure.

CLAIRE LOCKE Head of Environmental Services Cotswold District Council

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree