Reader's Letters RSS Feed


Did this hunt break the law

I HAVE lived in Royal Gloucestershire all my life and have been lucky enough to have witnessed some of the events and quaint customs specific to our wonderful county, the woolsack races and Forest tyre throwing amongst others.

There are some events and occasions I haven't yet experienced - the Severn bore and the cheese rolling in Gloucester fall into this latter category.

But this week I managed to ‘tick another box’, so to speak, as I stumbled upon a spectacle I hadn't observed before; a real, live, genuine fox hunt, complete with huntsmen resplendent in their red and black jackets.

Only this wasn't any run-of-the-mill fox hunt. This was a hunt of a differing variety; a hunt that was taking place exclusively on Her Majesty's tarmac highway.

Yes. Imagine my surprise when on my journey home last Monday afternoon, on the A433 Cirencester-Tetbury road, I came upon a large pack of scent hounds, several horseman and supporters on foot, all using the A road as their personal thoroughfare. I was quite taken aback by this most majestic of sights, I must say, but a couple of questions came to mind as I sat there, in the queue waiting for the morass to clear.

Please excuse my lack of knowledge and ignorance as I have two points that require clarification: * I was under the misapprehension that fox hunting, after the passing of the Hunting Act in 2004, had been deemed illegal?

What astounded me was I could have sworn I saw a red fox dash across the A433, with some of the hounds in pursuit. But then, maybe I was mistaken?

* I also understand, according to Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, it is an offence "to allow a dog to be dangerously out of control in a public place where it is not allow" and "the owner or the person in charge of the dog is guilty of said offence".

Now, these dogs were running wild and unrestrained on the A433, causing cars and lorries alike to swerve and veer sharply off course. Call me an old misanthropist, but I would suggest this is contrary to that Act. However I am open to correction.

Subsequently, I am mystified and need some elucidation. Is this manner of indiscriminate hunt exclusive to Gloucestershire?

All perplexing subject matter, I hope you agree. I trust the good readers of your tome can enlighten me.

DAVE BUNTING Northfield Road Tetbury

Comments(3)

nebhunting says...
3:10pm Fri 26 Mar 10

The Hunt was following a trial and as there are a lot of foxes around it is possible that a fox appeared and as the trial is layed with a fox like scent the hounds might have started to follow this, The Huntsman who is in charge of the Hounds would have the task of calling them back which is not easy but can be done given a little time. I am always impressed by the way a Huntsman can control his pack better than I can control my Fox Terrier and I think this applys to most people who have dogs, some people can't let their dogs of the lead as they are unable to control them but we do not cite the dangerous dogs act on them, no if we all had control of our dogs as a Huntsman has with his Hounds there would not need for such a law.

Union Man says...
1:12am Thu 1 Apr 10

It was an Eithiopian Wolf not a fox, so your assertions are completely false.
Oh and it's Trail not Trial

Supreme Chancellor Finis Valorum says...
11:53am Thu 1 Apr 10

nebhunting, you have missed the point by a "country mile" ... the hunt were breaking the laws of the land... to the detriment of other people adhering more or less strictly to these same laws. As is customary, when the upper class nobles are involved in misdemeanours they are not prosecuted.

I would suggest the "huntsmen" and their esteemed followers think they are above the edict.

Bring back the birch, or even better the stocks, for these miscreants, I say.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree