News RSS Feed


A document leaked to the Standard has revealed a split in Conservative politicians in the Cotswolds over the way May's local elections were conducted

A SECRET document leaked to the Standard this week has revealed a split among Tory politicians in the Cotswolds over the party's poor showing in May's local elections.

The leaked document reveals a crisis meeting was held on June 25, in which a group of defeated Conservative candidates expressed serious concerns over the party’s approach to the election.

Cotswold Conservatives lost 10 seats in the election, with nine out of ten wards in Cirencester now controlled by Liberal Democrat councillors.

The meeting was attended by Geoffrey Adams (candidate: Cirencester Park ward), Richard Buckley (candidate: Cirencester – Stratton Whiteway ward), Tony Curry (candidate: Cirencester Park ward) and Steve White (candidate: Cirencester – Watermoor ward), as well as district councillor John Burgess (Cirencester – Beeches ward).

The document reveals concerns within Cotswold Conservatives that the organisation is seen by voters as: "toffs legislating for toffs."

It is also argued that candidates in Cirencester wards had received little support from Gloucestershire Conservatives during the election.

Concerns were also raised about the impact of the cabinet’s links to Cotswold Media, which is run by cabinet leader Cllr Lynden Stowe (Campden-Vale ward) and also employs Cllrs David Fowles (Hampton ward) and Susan Jepson (Campden-Vale ward).

Cllr Fowles said he disagreed entirely with these claims.

"It’s not toffs legislating for toffs – its ordinary people legislating for ordinary people," he said.

"Our councillors are all from very diverse backgrounds, which reflects the diversity of people living in the Cotswolds and we try to pass legislation which serves them all."

Cllr Fowles added he did not believe his involvement with Cotswold Media affected his position within the cabinet.

"As one of those cabinet members who fought in a ward close to Cirencester it had no bearing on my election campaign and did not affect my result," he said.

"If anything I got a sympathetic ear on the doorstep from voters who valued my contribution."

Cotswolds Liberal Democrat leader Cllr Paul Hodgkinson said he shared the concerns expressed in the document.

"The result has obviously sent shockwaves through Tory ranks and they are right to fear they will loose control of the council in the next election," he said.

"At last the rank and file Tories are beginning to share our concerns and that is a very welcome development."

The document suggests a number of ideas to improve the party’s performance in future elections, including cutting council tax for the next four years and increasing volunteering and community participation among members.

It is also suggested the party should provide more support to candidates in the lead-up to elections, make literature more appealing and work towards improving its relationship with the press.

Comments(9)

David Broad says...
2:20pm Fri 7 Oct 11

I find it hugely disappointing that someone, presumably a colleague, leaked this confidential document to the Standard and that the Standard then published it.

ChrisR says...
2:37pm Fri 7 Oct 11

I totally agree. I understand that the document was marked "confidential". Surely then the Standard should have maintained standards and not published it.

sarah.white says...
4:28pm Fri 7 Oct 11

Disappointing but not really surprising! At least someone in the Cotswold Conservatives has a moral conscience!

Pentheus says...
6:21pm Fri 7 Oct 11

Cotswold Conservatives.

Out of touch....
Out of control...
Out of office...

David Broad says...
7:08pm Fri 7 Oct 11

It's disloyal and unfair.
The support I had from Barry Thurnell at Gloucestershire Conservatives and particularly from Lynden Stowe at Valepress in producing and editing my election material was superb and I know the Cirencester candidates enjoyed at least the same level of support.
My local association was brilliant as well. Elections are a real team effort which is why it hurts when someone deliberately lets the side down as with this leak.
I wonder if some disillusioned Lib Dem will now leak their post election conclusions, after fighting all but two wards and winning only 12 seats that would be interesting reading.

Crispin Mount says...
7:33pm Fri 7 Oct 11

Fascinating - an internal Tory mole explains so much of what has been revealed into the public domain in the past 18 months. Cllr Broad (yawn) is just paronoid because he's the Tory Whip and he can't control them.

Robert Jeanes says...
7:47pm Fri 7 Oct 11

But, Pentheus, still trying hard to fool the public.
Does not 'ChrisR', the 2.37 pm. blogger ring a bell somewhere? No?
Shome mistake then surely.… or was there really not a “gobby” CDC councillor voted out in May according to Private Eye? (Not a mention from the Standard about this....)
I recall many posts from ChrisR - every single one of them from Fairford.
So, it seems, it's 'business as usual'.

Council Taxpayer says...
11:48pm Fri 7 Oct 11

David Broad and ChrisR totally misunderstand the principles of our open society and a free press.
Our local newspaper would have miserably failed to uphold journalistic standards if it had suppressed this very revealing story. Maybe they should ponder the motivation of the Tory colleague who decided to leak the document.
The press is not there to collude with our local politicians or massage their inflated egos - a job done perfectly adequately by CDC's taxpayer funded propaganda sheet which masquerades as a newspaper.
We expect more from our genuine local newspaper and, fortunately for the democratic process, the Standard reports the truth without fear or favour.
If the two correspondents above don't like that, maybe they should move to North Korea.

Pentheus says...
6:53am Sat 15 Oct 11

Nice to see that "Fox" hunting has started again..... What is it about the attraction sleaze and the Conservatives ?

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree