Gloucestershire's PCC supports emergency surveillance legislation

Gloucestershire's Police and Crime Commissioner Martin Surl (8384895)

Gloucestershire's Police and Crime Commissioner Martin Surl (8384895)

First published in News

POLICE and Crime Commissioner for Gloucestershire Martin Surl has weighed in on controversial surveillance legislation which has been fast tracked through Parliament.

Martin Surl was the Police and Crime Commissioner who originally urged other PCCs to write to Theresa May about the need for a new Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act, or Drip, drawing on his experience with counterterrorism after the 7/7 bombings.

Just over half of the UK’s 41 Police and Crime Commissioners wrote to Home Secretary to show their support for the legislation.

Mr Surl said: “It is vitally important that our laws keep pace with developments in technology. This is about maintaining existing capabilities, not introducing new snooping laws”

“The police have long been able to identify anyone who has made a telephone call or sent an SMS text message, when and from where - but they are legally prohibited from doing the same for email, internet telephony, instant messaging or other internet-based services because communications service providers do not retain all of the relevant data.

He added that in time there ought to be an opportunity for the legislation to be reviewed, including the views of civil liberties groups.

He concluded by saying: “Emergency legislation is rarely perfect but there is an important balance to be struck between confidentiality and national security.”

The Act was announced and passed in just eight days in bid to return to the status quo of electronic surveillance.

This was made necessary after the Court of Justice of the European Union declared current levels of surveillance a breach of our basic rights in April this year.

The new Act will allow police and security services to continue to access phone and internet records detailing but also includes provisions that have more far reaching effects.

Despite receiving cross-party support the Act has been slammed by civil liberty groups and a group of technology experts have also expressed their concern about what the powers will mean for the UK.

In an open letter to the government they wrote: “The legislation goes far beyond simply authorising data retention in the UK.

“In fact, DRIP attempts to extend the territorial reach of the British interception powers, expanding the UK’s ability to mandate the interception of communications content across the globe.

“It introduces powers that are not only completely novel in the United Kingdom, they are some of the first of their kind globally.”

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:40pm Sat 19 Jul 14

Col Mustard says...

The Government will sit for 150 days only this year . Thats 215 days they do nothing . The solution to passing fully debated laws is obvious .
Rushed law is bad law and saying "He added that in time there ought to be an opportunity for the legislation to be reviewed, including the views of civil liberties groups." what crass rubbish. The job of the PCC is not law making it is to enforce it.

It will be interesting to see Mr Surl's comment on Gloucestershire Constabularies failing to record all crime when the HMIC full report is out !

The chief constable of Gloucestershire police, Tony Butler, said that the system of recording crime figures was unhelpful and needed to be "simplified". That was said 14 years ago in 2000 . It would appear the new improved system is underreporting crime by 20%. So thats an improvement.One way to show crime is falling is don't report it , particularly if the Chief Constables bonus is linked to it !
The Government will sit for 150 days only this year . Thats 215 days they do nothing . The solution to passing fully debated laws is obvious . Rushed law is bad law and saying "He added that in time there ought to be an opportunity for the legislation to be reviewed, including the views of civil liberties groups." what crass rubbish. The job of the PCC is not law making it is to enforce it. It will be interesting to see Mr Surl's comment on Gloucestershire Constabularies failing to record all crime when the HMIC full report is out ! The chief constable of Gloucestershire police, Tony Butler, said that the system of recording crime figures was unhelpful and needed to be "simplified". That was said 14 years ago in 2000 . It would appear the new improved system is underreporting crime by 20%. So thats an improvement.One way to show crime is falling is don't report it , particularly if the Chief Constables bonus is linked to it ! Col Mustard
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree