Councillor hits out at decision to approve 120 homes next to Fairford Football Club

Wilts and Gloucestershire Standard: Cllr Ray Theodoulou, who is also against the plans, standing on the land where the homes will be built Cllr Ray Theodoulou, who is also against the plans, standing on the land where the homes will be built

THE decision to approve a controversial 120-home planning application in Fairford has been called "poor" by one district councillor.

The application for 120 homes next to Fairford Football Club that raised concerns it could cause flooding in the town has been approved on its second attempt by Cotswold District Council.

Cllr Mark Wardle, of Fairford Town Council and CDC, said he thought the final decision was poorly made.

“The first decision was widely welcomed by the people of Fairford. Sustainable development is improving people’s lives – the key word here is improving," he said.

Cotswold District Council’s planning committee had kicked out the plan by Kensington and Edinburgh Estates for land next to Fairford Town FC’s ground in January.

They felt that the town’s sewer system was already struggling to cope with flooding in the town over Christmas, and there was no information from Thames Water about how the system could be improved, therefore, building houses on the land was out of the question.

However, after the outline application was refused, a housing scheme in Bourton-on-the-Water, where flooding was also an issue, was approved after Thames Water said it could resolve the issue. This prompted CDC’s planning officers to put the Fairford application back in for reconsideration, arguing that the water company could, therefore, ease flooding in Fairford as well.

A total of 165 letters of objection were sent in from Fairford groups and residents. Fairford’s Councillor Ray Theodoulou said he was “totally bewildered” that the application was back before the committee.

“Every time it rains, the pumps in the town are overwhelmed,” he said. “The only solution is to replace them but I don’t see anything in the application about this.”

Simon Hoare from Kensington and Edinburgh said he absolutely recognised there needed to be sewerage work done in Fairford.

“But if you refuse this application today, there will still be problems in the town,” he said.

The developer was told that the final scheme would need to include play areas and a contribution to Fairford Primary and Farmor’s schools to enable them to cope with the influx of students the development would bring.

Planning committee members were told that the development would help meet Government housing targets and include a building that would be for healthcare use.

The scheme split the committee, leaving planning chairman Robin Hughes to cast the decisive vote. He said he was sympathetic but “under the circumstances” voted in favour of the scheme.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:50pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Cotswold Lad says...

Fairford clearly does not need these 120 homes anyway, given the existing developments in other parts of the Town. CDC has not offered one crumb of comfort to the 165 objectors and the Town Council that they can halt any other new developments either.
Fairford clearly does not need these 120 homes anyway, given the existing developments in other parts of the Town. CDC has not offered one crumb of comfort to the 165 objectors and the Town Council that they can halt any other new developments either. Cotswold Lad

5:23pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Robert Jeanes says...

Fairford – Surely a Developers' Shangri-La?
A peek at Google Earth poses an interesting conundrum. The southernmost tip of this property is just 60 metres from Cygnet's Lake 104 where massive (gated) second-home development has been passed. Said 60 metres happens to be an unspoilt part of a public footpath and is a particularly treasured stretch.
Walkers from here will never again have views of the lovely barley field. Views of the lake are already all but gone, largely because of strategic tree planting and much re-siting of footpaths.
Two adjacent developers now have total sway on huge acreages.
What will there soon be to gaze upon - after the bulldozers that is?
Fairford – Surely a Developers' Shangri-La? A peek at Google Earth poses an interesting conundrum. The southernmost tip of this property is just 60 metres from Cygnet's Lake 104 where massive (gated) second-home development has been passed. Said 60 metres happens to be an unspoilt part of a public footpath and is a particularly treasured stretch. Walkers from here will never again have views of the lovely barley field. Views of the lake are already all but gone, largely because of strategic tree planting and much re-siting of footpaths. Two adjacent developers now have total sway on huge acreages. What will there soon be to gaze upon - after the bulldozers that is? Robert Jeanes

9:28pm Thu 20 Feb 14

Olly Cromwell says...

This picture of 'Ray of Sunshine' fame (Eyes passim) standing by a Cotswold 'lake' reminds me of his pivotal role as a Cabinet Member on Glos County Council when he 'gifted' publicly owned Keynes Country Park to others for the princely return of £1 to the public purse.

Totally bewildering.
This picture of 'Ray of Sunshine' fame (Eyes passim) standing by a Cotswold 'lake' reminds me of his pivotal role as a Cabinet Member on Glos County Council when he 'gifted' publicly owned Keynes Country Park to others for the princely return of £1 to the public purse. Totally bewildering. Olly Cromwell

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree