Standard readers give suggestions for what Cirencester's Christmas market chalets should be used for

Wilts and Gloucestershire Standard: Standard readers give suggestions for what Cirencester's Christmas market chalets should be used for Standard readers give suggestions for what Cirencester's Christmas market chalets should be used for

ANGRY Cirencester residents, who have grown tired of the town’s Christmas market chalets being left to rot, have come forward with ideas on how they should be used.

Many people have spoken out after the Standard revealed that the 47 chalets were being kept outside in the City Bank area of the town without any form of protection from the elements.

Victoria Luckie, 42, explained that it was “frustrating” to see the wooden structures left in such a way when they could be put to good use.

“I have sent 10 emails to Cirencester Town Council about turning the chalets into temporary accommodation for homeless people,” she said.

“I’ve spoken to a number of rough sleepers and they have all agreed it would be a good idea. I just think that this is something worth exploring.”

Readers of the Standard have grouped together online to come up with a host of suggestions as to what the chalets could be used for.

With temperatures across town plummeting, one user, writing under the name of Slinknet, said: “Why not use them for firewood for the poor and elderly?”

Claire McDonald got in touch to say that the chalets should be donated to those people who have lost their homes due to severe flooding.

She said: “People will help paint them up and businesses will donate paint to decorate. Let’s make something positive come out of this awful weather.”

Another website user, under the guise of Lvmffd, said the town council stands to make money if the chalets are hired out to other towns and villages in the area for various events.

Writing online, Col Mustard came up with the exotic idea that the chalets be transformed into something completely different, Finnish saunas.

It was also revealed this week that the Christmas chalets were bought in 2010 for £49,000, nearly £20,000 more than what was originally thought.

In the four years since their purchase, the chalets have only been used at four events – the three Christmas markets and at last summer’s Phoenix Festival.

Andrew Tubb, chief executive of Cirencester Town Council, said the chalets helped bring in 180,000 people over the course of three Christmases.

“The chalets therefore cost less than 30 pence per person in Cirencester during each of the Christmas Markets. This would have helped contribute towards sustaining the local economy,” he said.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:58pm Fri 21 Feb 14

carebear says...

it doesn't matter that the sheds cost 30p mr tubbs, what are they doing NOW? I could do with a new garden shed, I"ll give you 30p for one! no? I thought not!
it doesn't matter that the sheds cost 30p mr tubbs, what are they doing NOW? I could do with a new garden shed, I"ll give you 30p for one! no? I thought not! carebear
  • Score: 2

7:22am Sat 22 Feb 14

Col Mustard says...

Clearly Mr Tubb illustrates rather worryingly how an abuse of public money is justified . The purchase cost of the "Huts" is part of the cost. Storage cost has not been included or the loss of parking revenue from the market place whilst the disaster was in place over 3 Christmas periods . The revenue loss was at least £12,000 which Tubb has conveniently omitted.

Proof yet again that these idiots should not be in charge of the pettty cash let alone items of capital expenditure.

Perhaps in the interest of transparency the "Chief Exec" sic , will publish a full financial account of the Christmas venture including the marketing and PR fees paid , the website cost and any costs related to the 'Ice Rink" **** up that wasnt ice but plastic !

Over to you Mr Tubb publish if you dare ?
Clearly Mr Tubb illustrates rather worryingly how an abuse of public money is justified . The purchase cost of the "Huts" is part of the cost. Storage cost has not been included or the loss of parking revenue from the market place whilst the disaster was in place over 3 Christmas periods . The revenue loss was at least £12,000 which Tubb has conveniently omitted. Proof yet again that these idiots should not be in charge of the pettty cash let alone items of capital expenditure. Perhaps in the interest of transparency the "Chief Exec" sic , will publish a full financial account of the Christmas venture including the marketing and PR fees paid , the website cost and any costs related to the 'Ice Rink" **** up that wasnt ice but plastic ! Over to you Mr Tubb publish if you dare ? Col Mustard
  • Score: 4

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree