Cotswold District Council votes against introducing a tax on serving alcohol late at night

Wilts and Gloucestershire Standard: Cotswold District Council votes against introducing a tax on serving alcohol late at night Cotswold District Council votes against introducing a tax on serving alcohol late at night

PROPOSALS for a tax which would charge pubs and clubs in the Cotswolds for serving alcohol past midnight have been thrown out by district council.

Members of Cotswold District Council’s licensing committee chose not to adopt the Late Night Levy or Early Morning Restriction Order at its most recent meeting on Tuesday, February 4.

The levy, which would charge pubs and clubs to cover the cost of policing alcohol related anti-social behaviour during the early hours, is currently only used by two councils in the country; Newcastle City Council and Cheltenham Borough Council.

The council in Cheltenham estimates that the levy will generate an income of around £200,000 every year.

Amanda Morgan, commercial manager at CDC, advised members that if the tax was introduced it could cause unforeseen problems for the community.

“If the Licensing Authority was to introduce a levy in the centre of a town, it could lead to late night drinking venues opening in ‘edge of town centre’ locations,” she said.

“Thereby, this could lead to crime, disorder or public nuisance in adjacent residential areas.”

She also explained to members that the introduction would likely be subject to controversy and legal challenges by licensed venues in the Cotswolds.

A report issued to members noted that the tax would be unnecessary because out of the 130 licences premises in the district, there were only “occasionally some alcohol-related problems late at night in Cirencester.”

The committee voted unanimously in favour of the officer’s recommendation to not adopt the charges and to also work closely with local police to monitor alcohol-related crime.

Cllr Margaret Rickman (Lib Dem, Chesterton proposed that the introduction of the levy be reviewed on annual basis.

“I think that as the towns in the Cotswolds grow, this could become the way that things inevitably end up,” she said.

The proposal was given the unanimous support by all the committee members.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:32pm Thu 6 Feb 14

Geoff66 says...

What a short sighted decision CDC....when we are constantly seeing concerns raised by residents about issues associated with late night drinking and anti-social behaviour in and around the town centre. I am sure there will be many residents of the town centre who would like to see much more action being taken to curb these problems, not less, and now CDC have thrown away the opportunity to raise some much need revenue (focused on those using these premises, and those operating them) to support a range of measures which could have been implemented to tackle these problems.

An improved CCTV system (which actually works and which is monitored) would have helped, and this could have helped raise money to install this and maintain this system, yet alone police and agency operations and crack-down measures.

CDC councillors, I think you are so short sighted, and I really wonder whether you really represent the majority of us who live in the town and its surrounding suburbs.
What a short sighted decision CDC....when we are constantly seeing concerns raised by residents about issues associated with late night drinking and anti-social behaviour in and around the town centre. I am sure there will be many residents of the town centre who would like to see much more action being taken to curb these problems, not less, and now CDC have thrown away the opportunity to raise some much need revenue (focused on those using these premises, and those operating them) to support a range of measures which could have been implemented to tackle these problems. An improved CCTV system (which actually works and which is monitored) would have helped, and this could have helped raise money to install this and maintain this system, yet alone police and agency operations and crack-down measures. CDC councillors, I think you are so short sighted, and I really wonder whether you really represent the majority of us who live in the town and its surrounding suburbs. Geoff66
  • Score: -2

5:08pm Fri 7 Feb 14

Col Mustard says...

A report issued to members noted that the tax would be unnecessary because out of the 130 licences premises in the district, there were only “occasionally some alcohol-related problems late at night in Cirencester.”

Perhaps we could be told who was the author of the report ? as I cannot find it on the CDC website and wanted to check which Cirencester they are talking about ?
A report issued to members noted that the tax would be unnecessary because out of the 130 licences premises in the district, there were only “occasionally some alcohol-related problems late at night in Cirencester.” Perhaps we could be told who was the author of the report ? as I cannot find it on the CDC website and wanted to check which Cirencester they are talking about ? Col Mustard
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree