Cirencester town centre regeneration plans "can't be turned down"

An artist's impression of Cirencester's revamped Market Place An artist's impression of Cirencester's revamped Market Place

PLANS for a new Market Place for Cirencester must go ahead because the town council cannot afford to pull out now, it has been revealed.

Local residents have raised concerns over the regeneration scheme, which has crept upwards in estimated costs from around £1million to potentially £1.4m.

The project will see the town's centre transformed into a "shared space" where pedestrians have priority. Main issues raised relate to traffic plans, with reduced car parking spaces, re-routed buses and a new one-way system at Castle Street causing alarm.

At this month’s Cirencester Town Council meeting, deputy mayor Cllr Joe Harris called for a referendum on the scheme to ensure it had public support before plans went any further.

But he was told that the town council could not afford for the public to vote against it.

CTC’s chief executive officer Andrew Tubb said if a referendum determined the scheme should be scrapped, the council would need to pay back around £60,000 in funding.

"This council does not have that level of reserves," he said. "That will put this council in a seriously dangerous financial position."

It was agreed at the meeting to spend a further £15,000 on the project, bringing the running total to date to £75,000.

Jonathan Davies, who runs Lock Stock and Barrel in Market Place, said he had fears over the financial viability of the scheme.

"The council is worried about £60,000, but it's nothing compared to the £1.4m they plan to spend," he said. "That's a phenomenal amount; it will change Cirencester forever."

Mr Davies asked councillors to consider another round of public consultation and was told that would happen through the usual planning process.

CDC has agreed to give a £100,000 grant to the project, but will not have to hand over the money until it grants planning consent.

At the CTC meeting, town councillors were asked to decide whether a planning application should be submitted to CDC.

Cllr Gary Selwyn said: "I don’t see any way that this can be turned down."

Councillors agreed that a planning application should not be submitted until after the scheme was discussed again at the next full town council meeting on February 12.

Comments(8)

Union Man says...
12:01am Fri 1 Feb 13

It is about time Cirencester Town Councillors took responsibility and told their officers that the elected members make the decisions not the chief executive.
It is an outrage to go ahead with a proposal the majority of residents don't want just because some grants have to be repaid if the proposal doesn't happen.
Full marks to Joe Harris for standing up ffor democracy.

Cotswold Lad says...
11:37am Fri 1 Feb 13

Andrew Tubb should resign for leading the Town Council into this crazy situation. This is publlic money and the Town Council should have weighed up ALL the factors, such as the cost of it not going ahead, before giving the go-ahead to the architects. If the Town Council are worried about £60,000 how can they afford to spend £1.4m - where is that coming from? Joe Harris is right to call for a referendum, but even this may be too little, too late.
I see that Northleach are now looking at siting their market away from their market square - maybe the Town Council should ask "is there a cheaper alternative?"
Maybe the citizens of Cirencester should be asking "is there a cheaper alternative to the Town Council?"

Cotswold Lad says...
12:01pm Fri 1 Feb 13

Andrew Tubb should resign for leading the Town Council into this crazy situation. This is publlic money and the Town Council should have weighed up ALL the factors, such as the cost of it not going ahead, before giving the go-ahead to the architects. If the Town Council are worried about £60,000 how can they afford to spend £1.4m - where is that coming from? Joe Harris is right to call for a referendum, but even this may be too little, too late.
I see that Northleach are now looking at siting their market away from their market square - maybe the Town Council should ask "is there a cheaper alternative?"
Maybe the citizens of Cirencester should be asking "is there a cheaper alternative to the Town Council?"

Iansky says...
1:36pm Fri 1 Feb 13

I agree with Joe Harris, there should be a referendum - if we do not get reduced car parking charges needed to bring in visitors/shoppers, the scheme will be wasted and a lot of money lost.
Stop, ask the people, resolve parking charge issues, advertise better parking then review these plans.
We are supposed to live in a democracy not a dictatorship and I suspect this is more a case of someone not wanting "egg on their face" for bumbling on blindly without getting the will of the people who live / work in town.

Wigstar says...
4:59pm Fri 1 Feb 13

I believe the next full town council meeting is actually March 12th, not February, as stated.

Corinium200 says...
10:46pm Mon 4 Feb 13

I think the situation is a disgrace! If the council are up for losing £60,000 it, or someone should be accountable.
We do not need this facelift, people come to Cirencester to see it as it is.
I am 55 born and bread in Cirencester as were my parents and Grandparents. The council should remember who they serve not rule?
Regenerate?
We need to attract the right retailers and reduce parking charges to attract visitors!
Ask the people of Cirencester what they want for the town?

Cotswold Lad says...
3:17pm Tue 5 Feb 13

Reading elsewhere that our Council Tax is probably going up to give the Town Council more cash I can't help but wonder - if they had been more careful in the planning of the proposed Market Place development - would the increase be needed? It seems that the citizens of Cirencester will end up paying for the good, the bad and the downright ugly.

Corinium200 says...
12:21pm Thu 7 Feb 13

The CDC are actually killing Cirencester off.
No regeneration taking away the old look of Cirencester is going to work either just compound the problem.
If the CDC members were Cirencester of old they would see this but they are blind and arrogant with it appears self financial gain highest on priority?
Look at Stow on the Wold? thriving in its "old look".

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree